NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
+17%
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
