CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
+58%
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
VS
Quadro K2100M
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
576
32
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Board Design
142W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
2
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
3
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
4
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
5
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
7
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
8
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
9
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy