Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +523%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

142W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy