NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 D2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (142W vs 640W)
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2200 D2
+27%
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
256
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
640W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
