NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+508%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
256
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
