NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+9212%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
13312
32
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
