Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +289%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
924 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM204
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy