Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 +556%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
256
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

142W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G84
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy