Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +1330%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
256
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
95W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA106
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
12 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy