Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +370%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy