Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A6000 +7865%
38.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
84
256
Shading Units
10752
32
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA102
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy