Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +2954%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1935GB/s

Render Config

7
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
336
Shading Units
6912
56
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.650 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
26.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
638.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
53.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GA100
N12E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy