Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620 +35%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
7
384
Shading Units
336
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy