Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +35%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

7
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
336
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.650 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
26.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
638.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
53.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GM107
N12E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy