Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +5180%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
192
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA104
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy