Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +5682%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy