NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
15040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2347%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
16384
112
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
