Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +285%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

35W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy