Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
4256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1967%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
11
SM Count
72
352
Shading Units
4608
44
TMUs
288
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

152W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy