Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M +547%
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G84
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy