Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M +673%
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G84
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy