Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
12928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +6449%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
12
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
13312
48
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy