Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +84%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
924 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM204
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy