Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX +683%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy