Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +2560%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro CX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy