Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +3949%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
58
192
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy