NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (50W vs 2400W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 15 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

16352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro FX 1600M

0.08 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +65437%

52.43 TFLOPS

Quadro FX 1600M

VS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Graphics Card

Jun 2007

Release Date

Jan 2023

Quadro FX Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-HE

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

900 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1600 MHz

800 MHz

Memory Clock

1565 MHz

Memory

512MB

Memory Size

128GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

HBM2e

128bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

25.60GB/s

Bandwidth

3205GB/s

Render Config

-

4

SM Count

-

32

Shading Units

16384

16

TMUs

1024

8

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

1024

-

RT Cores

128

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

32 KB

L2 Cache

408 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

10.00 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1638 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

52.43 TFLOPS

80.00 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.43 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W

TDP

2400W

-

Suggested PSU

2800 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

-

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G84

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

NB8P-GLM

GPU Variant

-

Tesla

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

80 nm

Process Size

10 nm

0.289 billion

Transistors

100 billion

169 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

1.1

CUDA

-

4.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

2

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

3

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID K340

5

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

6

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID K100

7

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10

8

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

9

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

10

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU