Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.02GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100 +2577%
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy