Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro P500 Mobile +871%
0.777 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
32
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.29 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.14 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
777.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
18W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP108
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy