Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M +70%
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
32
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT218
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy