Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 640W)
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2100 S4 +332%
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
640W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G80
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy