Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200 +1338%
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy