Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +841%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy