Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +8455%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM200
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy