Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro P400 +701%
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
32
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy