Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (42W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M +19%
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
32
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G84
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy