Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40st to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40st 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla K40st +4040%
3.312 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.50 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.312 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1104 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK110B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy