Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB +9883%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
26
32
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA106
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
12 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy