Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +27737%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
58
32
Shading Units
7424
16
TMUs
232
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
165W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA103
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
22 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy