Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 24GB VRAM Tesla T40 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla T40 24 GB +17875%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Turing
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
624.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
32
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy