Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +23442%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA100
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy