Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro CX +683%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT200B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy