Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M +452%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy