Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +3915%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy