Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000 +7106%
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM204
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy