Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +2157%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GF110
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy