Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +8428%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy