CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+8428%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
VS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Board Design
42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
2
NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
4
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
5
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
6
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
7
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy