Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +15988%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
48
32
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU104B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy