Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +32391%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
AD104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy