Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M +229%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK107
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy